People always ask where story ideas come from, and honestly, sometimes they arrive as a scene, sometimes as a character, and sometimes as one question I just can't let go of.
For Unstable Bonds, it started with this:
What happens when the truth is not just hidden, but actively shaped into something else?
That idea stuck with me for a long time. The more I turned it over in my head, the more I realized I did not just want to write a thriller about secrets. I wanted to write a story about manipulation, pressure, evidence, corruption, and the terrifying feeling of realizing that the “official story” might not be the real one at all.
That was the seed of Unstable Bonds.
Why chemistry plays such a big role
A huge part of the concept behind this book comes from my background in chemistry.
Science has always been a big part of my life, and chemistry in particular is one of those subjects that completely changed the way I see the world. I love that chemistry is all about what is happening underneath the surface. Reactions build quietly. Tiny changes matter. Pressure matters. Structure matters. Contamination matters. One unstable component can throw everything off.
That felt perfect for a thriller.
I’m also in the process of becoming a high school chemistry teacher, so science is not just an interest for me. It is a huge part of how I think. It shapes the way I look at systems, cause and effect, patterns, and even people. When I started building Unstable Bonds, I knew I wanted chemistry to be more than set dressing. I did not want it to just sit in the background and look smart. I wanted it to actually belong in the bones of the story.
In this book, chemistry helps shape the mood, the tension, and the stakes. It is part of the world, part of the conflict, and part of what makes the story feel like this story and not just any thriller.
The ideas that pulled me in
At its core, Unstable Bonds is a psychological thriller about truth, power, and the damage that happens when people in control decide they would rather protect a version of events than face reality.
One of the biggest ideas behind the book is the concept of evidence.
We like to think evidence is objective. Solid. Reliable. Final. But evidence does not interpret itself. It is handled by people, explained by people, framed by people, and sometimes manipulated by people. Once I started thinking about that, the story really began to click into place for me.
What happens when the facts are there, but the people with power are determined to twist them?
What happens when the truth exists, but it is buried under fear, influence, bad faith, and carefully constructed lies?
What happens when someone knows something is wrong, but proving it could destroy their life?
That is the energy Unstable Bonds was built on.
More than twists
I love thrillers. I love tension, reveals, unraveling secrets, and those moments where everything shifts and you suddenly realize the story is more dangerous than you thought.
But for me, twists are never enough on their own.
I wanted Unstable Bonds to have emotional weight too. I wanted it to feel personal. I wanted the suspense to come not just from what is happening, but from what it is doing to the people caught inside it. Fear, guilt, obsession, grief, betrayal, mistrust — all of that matters just as much to me as the plot.
That is also where the title comes in.
Unstable Bonds works for me on both levels. On the chemistry side, it points to reactions, instability, and things falling apart under the right conditions. On the human side, it is about trust, relationships, institutions, and the fragile connections people depend on. Bonds between people can weaken. Loyalty can fracture. Systems can crack. Even memory and truth can become unstable.
That double meaning was there from the start, and the deeper I got into the story, the more important it became.
A story about contamination
In a lot of ways, this book is about contamination.
Not just chemical contamination, but emotional contamination, institutional contamination, and narrative contamination. One lie gets introduced, and then it spreads. Fear spreads. Corruption spreads. Doubt spreads. Before long, everything has been touched by it.
That idea really became one of the heartbeats of the novel.
Unstable Bonds is about pressure. It is about fracture points. It is about what happens when the truth starts leaking through the cracks and the people responsible would rather silence it than face it. It is about trying to hold onto reality when other people are working very hard to rewrite it.
Why this story feels bigger than one book
Even while writing this one, I had a strong feeling the story was larger than a single novel.
While Unstable Bonds stands on its own, it will most likely become a trilogy. I am already developing the second book, and right now it is most likely looking like a late 2027 or early 2028 release. There is still a lot more to uncover in this world, and I already know there are deeper layers I want to explore.
That is exciting for me as a writer, because it means the story does not end with the first set of answers. It opens outward.
Final thoughts
Writing Unstable Bonds gave me the chance to bring together so many things I love: science, suspense, layered characters, emotional fallout, and big questions about truth and power.
It is darker, sharper, and more psychologically intense in a lot of ways, and that made it an especially fun book to write. If you like thrillers with secrets, pressure, paranoia, and a scientific edge, this one is very close to my heart.
And I’m really excited to finally start sharing more about it.
Want to stay in the loop? You can preorder Unstable Bonds and join my mailing list for updates, sneak peeks, and more behind-the-scenes looks at what’s coming next.